Jump to content

'Grey's' Actors Mad at Creator?


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

BTW, look at the preivew for BROTHERS AND SISTERS on the ABC Website. Calista's family is Conservative and she plays a Conservative radio pundit. UIn the previews, she babbles on about the Republican party on her radio show, but says, "I do think our party spends too much time in people's bedrooms." Hehehe. I wonder how that will go over?

It just looks like an intriguing drama. Anything airing after HOUSEWIVES except GREY'S is good in my book. I'll give the show a shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:o

:o

:o

And she calls herself a CONSERVATIVE?!!!

That !@#$%^&*]!!!

I WAS intrigued by this show.

Now I'm wondering if I should give it the time. If it's just liberal writers trying to write a "Conservative family" so Conservatives will watch and be brainwashed by subtle liberal propaganda, I am going to WHIP OUT the placards and head for ABC headquarters!!!!! :angry::angry:

Ugh. I wonder if SUPERCHICK knew about this before lending their hit Christian song to this foul-mouthed skein!! :angry::angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For the record, there are LOTS of Conservatives out there who lean a little left when it comes to gay rights. Hello, ever heard the term, "Log Cabin Republican"? Marc Cherry, Creator of DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES, is a gay Conservative and proud of it from what I have read. I have lots of Conservative friends who support gay rights. And last time I checked, you DO watch HOUSEWIVES, no? I guess they are pushing the gay agenda too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

bellcurve, my problem is that the "bedroom" phrase can be HIGHLY ambiguous. Yes, it may mean gay rights ... it may just be a knock at abstinence-only education ... or maybe, just maybe, it means the dreaded interpretation: ABORTION rights. It's not what the character said that bothers me; it's that there are several different meanings and interpretations for what she said. And if ambiguous language like that is an indicator of the subtle liberal agenda-pushing we can expect from a show that may well be a 'wolf in sheep's clothing,' agenda-wise, we are headed for disaster.

As for "Housewives," I've always enjoyed the Conservative bent to that show. I know some people think it's so shocking with the married woman/groundskeeper affairs and such, but if you really look at the setting, the characters, their daily lives...it's a pleasant, Conservative type of show. As for the 'gay' agenda. I guess that's seen, but not moreso than other shows, I'd imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy