Jump to content

teplin

Members
  • Posts

    1,099
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by teplin

  1. 2 hours ago, DRW50 said:

    I tried to get through some of the scenes that someone put up from not too long before then - when Sharlene confronted John about the affair - and it was all so empty and precise, and not reminiscent of the AW I ever knew. 

     

    The story was ridiculous and I didn't buy for a second that the John, Felicia and Sharlene I knew would behave the way they were being written. The only saving grace was that Holbrook and Dano got some meaty material to play -- out of character, for sure, but I was happy the actresses got to strut their stuff. The transformation from earth mother to scorned woman irrevocably damaged the Sharlene character, though.

     

    I liked the opening when it debuted, still do actually, but it didn't match the spirit of the show, no matter how much JFP tried to morph it into something else. And yes, it was terribly impractical. 

  2. Anna Holbrook was so good. I know she won an Emmy, but I still think she was underrated. Though that's true of a lot of AW actors and actresses ... always the red-headed stepchildren of the soap world. 

  3. I was watching sporadically at this point, but a quick run-through of the above videos reveals a host of characters I don't remember at all -- John's girlfriend Chris? Kevin and his family? Detective Rick? Were these characters introduced by Harding Lemay in his short return stint? I look forward to watching them all!

  4. I don't know why Fitzpatrick left, it doesn't seem to me that he was there for very long ... but I much preferred him to Russom's Willis. He was brash, cocky, sexual. I would never have bought Gwen with Fitzpatrick's Willis, it just wouldn't have worked visually. Russom, as someone pointed out above, was much softer in his portrayal -- though he was probably a better actor. He certainly built a long acting career. I never saw Fitzpatrick again.

     

    As to Jacqueline Courtney: I pretty much worship at Harding Lemay's feet, but I have always thought he was way off on her.

  5. Harry Bellaver (Ernie Downs) having a few line troubles there ... funny I can recognize both his and Connie Ford's voices, but Robin Strasser's -- I assume that's Rachel they're talking to -- is unrecognizable. There's an Audra Lindley (Aunt LIz) audio clip floating around in which the voice is similarly sped up, which is too bad, because it undercuts how malevolent Lindley's Liz was (as opposed to Irene Dailey's more ineffectual Aunt Liz). 

  6. "Is there any character in all of daytime television that is more remarkable than Julie Olson? [She’s] sort of super-woman whose weaknesses of character mix well with the strength of her sensuality, whose unwitting villainy never keeps us from sympathizing with her deep-down sincerity and need for love. She is the ultimate sexual pawn of fate. Susan Seaforth, the bombshell who plays her, has so much animal magnetism, so much female gutsiness, that in her scenes it’s hard to take one’s eyes off her for a second."

     

    I had to quote this from the review Carl posted because I agree with every word. And to think DAYS threw the character (and the actress) down the toilet just a few years later, turning her into a grandmother in her early 30s and then sidelining her into dreary, cliched mother-daughter conflict with the newly aged Hope. DAYS has made more boneheaded mistakes than any soap in history -- the 1980 reboot was a big one -- but for me, the mishandling of Julie (and Susan Hayes) ranks #1. 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  7. "You are so right about the music. It really makes the scene.  That's what's missing from today's soaps."

    It's still Bob Cobert doing the music, right? It's so distinctive -- I can hear shades of his Dark Shadows work. 

  8. Fantastic! You'll hear Olive wailing at the end -- that's what played under the closing credits for the day. No music. It's one of the soap moments that have stayed with me through the years and I'm so happy to hear it again. Thanks for sharing.

  9. Yes, thank you. Doug Watson was fantastic, but boy, had this show wandered far afield from Harding Lemay's vision for the show. The trial was pure melodrama, redeemed only by the performances, and everything else on the show at this point was dull as dishwater. Russ and Tracy? Snooze! Jerry and Larry? Snooze! Miranda and her clan? Snooze!

  10. No offense to John Clarke, but I was always amazed at how his looks took Mickey from being in his 20's in the 1960's to his apparent 50's by the 1970's. No wonder his storylines dried out by the time the 1980's arrived.

    I like John Clarke, but I think the Mickey-Maggie partnership was unfortunate for Suzanne Rogers, at least post-1980. DAYS prematurely aged her out of major storylines -- similar to what they did with Susan Hayes -- and I have to believe much of it was because Mickey was so dull and stodgy. The show should have followed up her Emmy win with more meaty material, but she basically just faded into the background. Personally, I would have been fine with Micky never escaping from Stephano's clutches and Maggie really moving ahead with Don.

    Then again, if she had spun off in a non-Horton direction, she might not have had the staying power she did.

  11. Charles Keating's photo was flashed on screen during last night's "In Memoriam" segment of the Tony Awards. Unfortunately, it was just after the director switched to a camera angle that made the screen very difficult to see.

  12. Even though the two Irises had very different acting styles and very different takes on the character, each actress was/is larger than life. That's why both were believable.

    The character itself was written very differently. For instance McKinsey's Iris was a "woman of leisure" -- there's no way she would have worked at Cory Publishing, or anywhere. It would have been beneath her. Yet Duncan's Iris was career-driven. One could argue that she molded herself into that as a way to prove her worth to "Daddy" -- but I believe that would have been the last tactic McKinsey's Iris would have taken.

    I was so excited when Rachel opened the Cory Mansion door on a Friday and said "Iris??!!?" And so disappointed that Iris turned out to be a shrill, rather manic Australian woman. I grew to like Carmen Duncan well enough -- to the point I was pissed that the show got ride of her -- but she was never really Iris to me.

  13. Jacker had some interesting ideas -- including the introduction of a major African-American presence on the canvas -- but the execution was terrible. And she badly mishandled favorite favorites (including Pat) in her rush to introduce new characters.

    I liked both Tucci and Moss but Sandi Ferguson was always Amanda to me. Glad she was back for the show's final months, even though her story was terrible. Funny that someone said Ferguson looked nothing like Vicky Wyndham -- I remember a soap mag at the time of Ferguson's initial casting praising the choice because the new Amanda looked so much like Rachel. (I didn't see the resemblance either.)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy