Vee

This is a jawdropper from the above:

Martin Campbell! That's a shocker, I loved his work on the original Edge of Darkness and the Bond films.

I always thought that was Sharon Gless, myself. But it could well be Stefanie Kramer.

I said this the other day, but all this just makes me that much more curious how Diane English and Murphy Brown - which tapes only a few weeks ahead specifically so that it may take on current events, and which has intended to tackle #MeToo - will handle all this. They can't fail to.

I was just wondering how and why Linda Bloodworth-Thomason fell off so hard when she came up here not long ago. Now we know, and I should've known. But it's the same story with women like Janet Jackson, like Annabella Sciorra as a rising movie star in the '90s. We know now what happened to them. These men happened to them. That one was especially crazy.

Wow.

I don't think this is in any way some sort of double swerve to try to help the GOP - with the exception of Politico and some of the folks at the NYT, I don't think the media is interested in that so much as they get completely blinkered by Beltway thinking (which invariably leads to conservative sympathizing) and the horse race and treat things like a big game. Some journalists know it isn't. Some never will. And I do think most of the media want the GOP out of control of the House if only to stopgap Trump - I think most major media personalities do believe the GOP is corrupt and out of control and need to be handicapped this year. That doesn't mean they'll ever stop criticizing Democrats first once it's done. Like what we now see at Facebook, it is about the press' constant fear of 'liberal bias' and a generational slant towards not only conservative thought, but more importantly overcorrecting and reporting the conservative viewpoint to prove they are not 'too liberal.' What they've never understood is the GOP will never stop calling them liberal. I think the article is an accurate summation of the GOP's fears. Do I think they will lose the Senate? Probably not. But it is in play and I hope we can make it very close.

A recent quote from TP producer Sabrina Sutherland, who is very close to Lynch:

Meanwhile, in 1990:

We knew the latter paragraph here long ago, but seeing it in print from Woodward's book, backed up by witnesses, still makes my blood run cold.

50's career would have been over (sooner) if that had happened, absolutely. That being said: While I absolutely think there was a major racial element with what happened with Janet, I do think Moonves would've gone after Britney in the same situation if he felt she - or any woman - had failed to be properly deferential. His pattern suggests any woman who defies him is to be destroyed.

I agree. And I think she's going to walk. I also don't think CBS will have her long even if she did cut him loose.

Full video at link:

I thought Sharon Osbourne's statement was probably as blunt as it could be in their impossible situation - and very candid that they might all get canned. TMZ has some of the video but I hate them so I'm not linking it, though I did watch it. This is a rundown. Apologies - I didn't realize the above link had more as well:

IIRC John Dunn, the first(?) Tad, left the show and memorably played a foul-mouthed teen who got mutilated in the horror classic Sleepaway Camp a year or something after exiting AMC. I had no idea the guy was on the show until I read up on the cast after rewatching it recently.

Convention Q&A: Sherilyn Fenn apparently had no idea of Audrey's new backstory with Cooper until seeing it on TV. Harry Goaz has theories on the Audrey storyline. And more. More: