Jump to content

MTV's Primetime


bandbfan

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Over the last week I was flipping through the channels in the 8 and 9 pm hours. I always stop at MTV to see what's on.

It just seems to me that they really don't have anything going for them. The only "popular" show that they really have is the Hills. And it wouldn't even be around if they hadn't had Laguna Beach. Likewise for the City and "Bromance" (shudder).

I may be mistaken, but to me it seemed that 5-10 years ago, MTV actually had a "decent" lineup. There was almost always a Real World or Road Rules on (back when they were better). They had a show on pretty much every week night, and they used to have to use the whole two hours for shows. Take the Hills for an example now. We have re-runs before the show. And then the "aftershow" (shudder again) and then they show it again after that. That's pretty much how every night works. I'm surprised everytime they re-new the Hills just because the cast seems so over it. But I guess $$ talks. And nothing against Whitney, but I don't know if she can carry a show by herself.

The challenges have just gotten bad. I admit I still catch a few episodes, but I don't really care about a lot of the newbies. And even if you liked somebody on their original show, they may make a complete jackass/b!tch of themselves on the new stuff.

I think they need something new and fresh and actually be devoted to it. MTV used to be more edgey, but it seems like everything on now is pretty tame. I guess theres A Shot At Love, but I don't think anybody takes that seriously. If anything, I think the viewers would be more accepting of a show like Undressed. (Whether or not that's a good thing is another topic). They don't HAVE to have something in the "reality" genre. Make a teen/college age drama that's on the edge.

Guess I'll stop rambling, but that's how I feel about the state of their lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

What I'm saying is that they used to have more than just one show a night. And they've been making shows hour-long now. We didn't need hour-long Real Worlds when it was good. And even their recent bigger rated shows (bigger being very subjective) like Hills and Laguna aren't/weren't hour-long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

New article about MTV's lineup.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR111799766...yid=14&cs=1

Basically says they've lost about a quarter of their 12-34 demos in everything, including their prized Hills. And are launching 16 new reality shows. Ugh. And they're doing something I wondered about...expanding their "new" programming block to two hours a night. Supposedly they're wanting to move to shows that look and feel like the Hills, which the "semi-scripted" stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
    • I had thought that there was a Tommy Biddles on there, but then I realized I was thinking of Dr. Biddles on Santa Barbara. Never mind! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I have watched the scene where Vanessa reads the letter and it's lovely, but I'm really glad now that I never got around to watching the funeral. Henry ADORED Nola! He treated her like a daughter and Stacy like a granddaughter. That's why Vanessa couldn't stand her. He was crazy about all the Reardons. He spent a lot of time at the boarding house. He and Bea--they never explicitly said it was romantic, but they certainly were loving friends. This sounds worse than Bert's funeral. I really did not think that was possible.
    • It always bothered me from the start that Nicole just took Mona's suggestion and never checked references.  A real psychiatrist would have done more before hiring someone. ** I like that Kat's reporter/investigative type instincts caused her to be suspicious of Eva from the start, and to try to spy on Eva and catch her as weeks went by. However, I think that Kat's so focused on what Eva did wrong -- that she won't see that Leslie is the master manipulator, making some things appear different than they actually are. I hope that Shanice's natural snoopy nature will get her to figure out what actually happened to Laura, and who really caused all the problems. *** edit to add: The show never specified what Mona's job was for Nicole.  Home manager?  Office manager?  Head personal assistant?  I'm sure there would have been a title?    Mona asserted today her upset with Eva and with Leslie.  That they used her and ruined her reputation.  I just wish I knew what Mona's job was. If Mona was an official manager, then it would have made sense for Nicole to trust the recommendation, if Nicole thought Mona had done a proper hiring procedure.  But if Mona is just an informal helper, then why wouldn't Nicole order a background check?
    • And I'm here for it.   Also...YES, PLEASE. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy