Jump to content

ABC Daytime: The Sinking Ship


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree....none of the soaps are looking very good these days. Frons is an idiot, but you're right, he could be replaced with someone twice as bad. He needs someone to be his equal and work with him and share in the decisions, that way AMC, OLTL, and GH might have a little better chance.

But even without Frons, the glory days of soap operas are behind us. The best we can hope for is that they will do the best they can with what's left of the genre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Frons is the worst thing to happen to ABC Daytime Ever. ABC can try whatever new nonsense, it's Doug Marland's vintage guidelines, Nixon's classic forumla for soaps that work. The horror show that is known today as AMC is NOT AMC and THAT's why people don't watch. Same for the other soaps. Also, usually when we are SOOOO frustrated as to call for a specific person to be fired we NEVER want them back. I don't think there is a soap fan alive who wishes to inflict ANY soap with the trashtacular writing styles of Megan McTavish. We wanted her gone in 97, didn't want her back in 03 and never want to see her again. Same for others. I for one, want Frons banished from television, but that doesn't mean I want Angela Shapiro back as ABC Daytime Prez (Maybe Felicia Bher). I think ABC soap fans complainin in lue of changing the chanel because it pains us to see how bad the shows are doing. Sure, there have always been things that have upset us but MAN, nothing in say 1995 would have made us as angry as we are almost daily, these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's funny how hindsight works--NO ONE at the time liked Angela Shapiro's managing of the schedule except maybe for creating Super Soap Weekend. But that was her thing--she focused more on hiring people for the shows (even if many of her choices were suspect) and then more or less leaving them be and focusing on ideas like Shop the SOaps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Does anyone think when the time comes for Frons to leave that his replacement will be a marked improvement over his tenure? First there was McTavish, now there's Esensten & Brown. On OLTL, many people complained about Maxine Levinson, then came JFP. The same occured in the HW arena with Claire & Matthew Labine, followed by Pamela Long, then McTavish. On GL, there was Ellen Weston, followed by David Kreizman. On the producing side, there was Paul Rauch, followed by John Conboy, followed by Ellen Wheeler. It seems as if the successors are worse than the predecessors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The audience for soaps really peaked during the mid-70s when some of the top-rated soaps (ATWT and AW) could pull over 10 million viewers each day. One suspects that there was a gentle decline in overall soap viewership after then, interrupted by the surge of ABC Daytime around 1979-80.

But here's the catch. Given that soap viewership declined in each decade (which was generally an accepted reality), why is it that nobody pannicked about the future and viability of the genre as much then? By 1990, ratings were down from the previous decade. By 2000, ratings were down on the previous decade too... but even then it didn't seem as bad. Just my observations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Soapfans love drama, and if there isn't enough of it onscreen, they create their own. Someone is always going to dislike something. However, there is much to dislike about the general nature of soaps right now, and some disgruntlement with Frons is justified.

Frons has repeatedly through his choice of programming and interview quotes shown that he has a really low opinion of the public he supposedly serves. For some of those quotes alone, he should have been shown the door a long time ago. Soap fans 'need to be trained' he spoke as he outlined his vision. In the same video segment, he said that no one wanted to see a middle aged woman in a love story, re Genie Francis. He called Y and R fans the 'nursing home crowd.'

Since he took over, ABCD blatantly publicizes its show of skin. In one interview, Frons responded to someone commenting on how dark the summer stories were, pointed at the then new Jess and Nash, saying that a lot of young hot people running around scantily dressed would distract people from the darkness. Just recently, FV highlighted that an upcoming summer episode would feature Tuc Watkins in a speedo.It's always going to be there at some level, but the openness of it is at best questionable, especially when also openly targetting teen girls.

Frons may have Fired DH and MM, but only under extreme pressure. He is also the one who HIRED them. DH's tenure was far, far too long. The 'improvements' Carlivati is making to OLTL is basically returning it to the shape it was in when Malone left.

I believe Soapnet was well in place before Frons. Frons has only been managing Soapnet for just over a year - and pushed Fashionista Diaries onto it as 'original programming'. His loyalty is not to soaps, but to whatever he can market most profitably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oops, my mistake on SOAPnet.

Believe me, I'm not Frons's biggest fan. There are a lot of things I hate about him. I've heard that he's a huge fan of the mob storylines on GH, and there is not one single thing I long for more in soaps than the back-burner-ing of the mob. I hold him partly responsible for GH's failure to give Genie Francis a contract. I agree that he kept DH and MM too long, and wish he would fire Guza. I don't think I ever said that I was a fan of his.

What I did say was that I don't think he's necessarily such a terrible thing for soaps. For me, quality is less important than the long-term survival of the soaps. And yes, believe me, I understand that quality is a very important ingredient in the survival of soaps, but CBS soaps are, in my opinion, of a higher quality than ABCD, and yet the numbers on many of their soaps, and the NBC soaps are dropping much faster than ABCD. The ABC soaps are very flawed, but I expect them to last longer, and I think a small part of the reason why is thanks to Frons.

I would love to see my soaps get better, and reach the level of quality they were at in previous decades, and there are a lot of things I think Frons could be doing that he isn't, but I do see ABCD taking risks and making efforts to innovate within soaps to bring in viewers in a way that the other networks are not.

So just to reiterate: I am not a fan of Frons. All I am trying to do is point out some of the good things he has done for daytime, since bashing tends to be one-sided and repetitive. Sorry, I'm a contrarian.

And in answer to the question of who could be worse, maybe someone who let soaps die without any efforts to turn things around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Week of September 17-21, 2007

Total Viewers (Last Week/Last Year) (Same Week: 2003)

3. GH 3,383,000 (+17,000/+238,000) (-682,000)

4. OLTL 3,059,000 (+63,000/+7,000) (-504,000)

6. AMC 2,802,000 (+10,000/-188,000) (-756,000)

Total Viewers: Same Week 2003

3. GH 4.065 million viewers

6. OLTL 3.563

7. AMC 3.558

Household Ratings: 2007/Same Week 2003

3. GH 2.6/3.1 (-.5)

4. OLTL 2.4/2.8 (-.4)

5. AMC 2.2/2.9 (-.7)

Women 18-49 Viewers: Same Week 2003

1. GH 1,161,000 (+42,000/-6,000) (-499,000)

GH--Friday: 3,271,000 Looks like the Michele Val Jean/Mary Sue Price treatment is paying off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

With November Sweeps around the corner, and possible budget cuts (budgets are based on Sweeps ratings), ABC Daytime is not looking good.

One thing GH needs to do is create interesting stories for characters like Epiphany, Jane, Monica, Edward, Scott, Helena, Alice, Jimmy Lee, Lesley, Blackie, Mike, Bobbie, Joe Kelly, Alexis, Skye, Anna, Holly, Mac, Lucas, and Robert. This will surely increase viewership.

AMC needs a complete creative overhaul.

Why is that OLTL does not entice more past thespians to return like GH does. OLTL needs the ratings boost, and ABC can afford the costs.

Week of October 1-5, 2007

Total Viewers (Last Year) (Same Week 2003)

3. GH 3,030,000 (-43,000) (-848,000)

4. OLTL 2,760,000 (-145,000) (-742,000)

6. AMC 2,623,000 (-222,000) (-996,000)

Total Viewers: Same Week 2003

3. GH 3.878 million viewers

5. AMC 3.619

7. OLTL 3.502

Household Ratings: 2007/Same Week 2003

3. GH 2.4/3.1 (-.7)

5. AMC 2.2/3.1 (-.9)

5. OLTL 2.2/3.0 (-.8)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy