September

October 25, 200619 yr

Administrator

Aug 30 - Sep 3, 2004

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,008,000 (-377,000/-681,000)

2. GH 3,790,000 (-20,000/-385,000)

3. DAYS 3,734,000 (NA /+227,000)

4. AMC 3,523,000 (-78,000/-141,000)

5. B&B 3,514,000 (-215,000/-735,000)

6. ATWT 3,163,000 (-87,000/-703,000)

7. OLTL 3,002,000 (same/-655,000)

8. GL 2,549,000 (-196,000/-1,002,000)

9. PSNS 2,362,000 (NA /-131,000)

Households

1. Y&R 4.0 (-.2)

2. GH 3.1 (same)

3. DAYS 2.9

3. B&B 2.9 (-.2)

3. AMC 2.9 (+.1)

6. ATWT 2.6 (same)

7. OLTL 2.5 (same)

8. GL 2.1 (-.1) <---- ties low

9. PSNS 1.8

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. DAYS 1,494,000 (NA /+183,000)

2. GH 1,435,000 (-27,000/+183,000)

3. AMC 1,357,000 (+15,000/+7,000)

4. Y&R 1,352,000 (-198,000/-117,000)

5. OLTL 1,142,000 (-4,000/-207,000)

6. PSNS 1,034,000 (NA /-113,000)

7. B&B 1,000,000 (-121,000/-226,000)

8. ATWT 926,000 (-111,000/-165,000)

9. GL 795,000 (-53,000/-360,000)

Women 18-49

1. DAYS 2.3

2. GH 2.2 (-.1)

3. Y&R 2.1 (-.3)

3. AMC 2.1 (same)

5. OLTL 1.7 (-.1)

6. PSNS 1.6

7. B&B 1.5 (-.2)

8. ATWT 1.4 (-.2)

9. GL 1.2 (-.1) <---- low

Girls 12-17 Viewers

1. PSNS 76,000 (NA /+14,000)

2. GH 57,000 (-6,000/+13,000)

3. AMC 55,000 (-4,000/+23,000)

4. DAYS 46,000 (NA /+14,000)

5. OLTL 45,000 (+7,000/+26,000)

6. Y&R 44,000 (-15,000/+19,000)

7. GL 27,000 (+3,000/+17,000)

8. B&B 11,000 (-14,000/+1,000)

9. ATWT 9,000 (-17,000/-24,000)

Women 50+ Viewers

1. Y&R 2,283,000 (-23,000/-250,000)

2. B&B 1,679,000 (+10,000/-228,000)

3. ATWT 1,560,000 (+89,000/-280,000)

4. GH 1,536,000 (+79,000/+34,000)

5. AMC 1,315,000 (+37,000/-42,000)

6. DAYS 1,243,000 (NA /-79,000)

7. GL 1,206,000 (-110,000/-364,000)

8. OLTL 1,181,000 (+3,000/-117,000)

9. PSNS 576,000 (NA /-32,000)

Men 18+ Viewers

1. Y&R 1157,000 (+5,000/-338,000)

2. DAYS 764,000 (NA /+89,000)

3. B&B 678,000 (-38,000/-290,000)

4. AMC 658,000 (-27,000/-49,000)

5. GH 578,000 (-11,000/-197,000)

6. ATWT 546,000 (-25,000/-247,000)

7. PSNS 523,000 (NA /+17,000)

8. OLTL 517,000 (+32,000/-235,000)

9. GL 400,000 (-36,000/-240,000)

Women 25-54

1. GH 2.8 (-.1)

2. AMC 2.6 (+.2)

3. Y&R 2.4 (-.4)

4. DAYS 2.3

5. OLTL 2.2 (-.1)

6. B&B 1.8 (-.1)

7. ATWT 1.7 (-.1)

8. PSNS 1.5

9. GL 1.4 (-.2)

Women 18-34

1. DAYS 2.8

2. PSNS 1.9

2. GH 1.9 (+.1)

4. Y&R 1.6 (same)

5. AMC 1.4 (same)

6. B&B 1.3 (same)

6. OLTL 1.3 (+.1)

8. ATWT 1.2 (-.1)

9. GL 1.1 (-.1)

September 6-10, 2004

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,178,000 (+170,000/-724,000)

2. GH 4,039,000 (+249,000/+219,000)

3. AMC 3,879,000 (+356,000/+570,000)

4. DAYS 3,829,000 (+95,000/+182,000)

5. B&B 3,616,000 (+102,000/-604,000)

6. OLTL 3,491,000 (+489,000/+181,000)

7. ATWT 3,230,000 (+67,000/-497,000)

8. GL 2,722,000 (+173,000/-450,000)

9. PSNS 2,520,000 (+158,000/-33,000)

1. Y&R 4.1 (+.1)

2. GH 3.4 (+.3)

3. AMC 3.1 (+.2)

4. DAYS 3.0 (+.1)

4. B&B 3.0 (+.1)

6. OLTL 2.8 (+.3)

7. ATWT 2.6 (same)

8. GL 2.2 (+.1)

9. PSNS 2.0 (+.2)

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. DAYS 1,539,000 (+45,000/+67,000)

2. GH 1,495,000 (+60,000/-57,000)

3. Y&R 1,450,000 (+98,000/-172,000)

4. AMC 1,375,000 (+18,000/+138,000)

5. OLTL 1,264,000 (+122,000/-84,000)

6. PSNS 1,079,000 (+45,000/-69,000)

7. B&B 949,000 (-51,000/-183,000)

8. ATWT 892,000 (-34,000/-35,000)

9. GL 783,000 (-12,000/-168,000)

Women 18-49

1. DAYS 2.3 (same)

1. GH 2.3 (+.1)

3. Y&R 2.2 (+.1)

4. AMC 2.1 (same)

5. OLTL 1.9 (+.2)

6. PSNS 1.6 (same)

7. ATWT 1.4 (same)

7. B&B 1.4 (-.1) <---- all time low

9. GL 1.2 (same) <---- low

Girls 12-17 Viewers

1. PSNS 66,000 (-10,000/+38,000)

2. DAYS 57,000 (+11,000/+37,000)

3. GH 35,000 (-22,000/-24,000)

4. B&B 29,000 (+18,000/+13,000)

5. ATWT 27,000 (+18,000/+7,000)

6. OLTL 23,000 (-22,000/+3,000)

6. GL 23,000 (-4,000/+8,000)

8. AMC 20,000 (-35,000/+12,000)

9. Y&R 18,000 (-26,000/-5,000)

September 13-17, 2004

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,332,000 (+154,000/-496,000)

2. GH 3,899,000 (-140,000/+67,000)

3. AMC 3,898,000 (+19,000/+373,000)

4. B&B 3,778,000 (+162,000/-711,000)

5. DAYS 3,461,000 (-368,000/-210,000)

6. OLTL 3,376,000 (-115,00/-93,000)

7. ATWT 3,138,000 (-92,000/-857,000)

8. GL 2,682,000 (-40,000/-1,010,000)

9. PSNS 2,390,000 (-130,000/-134,000)

Households

1. Y&R 4.1 (same)

2. AMC 3.1 (same)

2. GH 3.1 (-.3)

4. B&B 3.0 (same)

5. DAYS 2.9 (-.1)

6. OLTL 2.7 (-.1)

7. ATWT 2.6 (same)

8. GL 2.2 (same)

9. PSNS 1.9 (-.1)

Women 18-49

1. GH 2.3 (same)

2. DAYS 2.2/14 (-.1)

2. Y&R 2.2 (same)

2. AMC 2.2 (+.1)

5. OLTL 2.0 (+.1)

6. PSNS 1.6/10 (same)

6. B&B 1.6 (+.2)

8. ATWT 1.3 (-.1)

9. GL 1.2 (same) <---- low

Women 18-34

1. DAYS 2.6/16 (-.2)

2. PSNS 2.0/12 (same)

Girls 12-17

1. Y&R 73,000 (+54,000/+44,000)

2. PSNS 65,000 (-1,000/+15,000)

3. B&B 59,000 (+30,000/+30,000)

4. GH 47,000 (+12,000/-18,000)

5. DAYS 41,000 (-16,000/+10,000)

6. ATWT 36,000 (+9,000/+6,000)

7. AMC 30,000 (+10,000/+11,000)

8. OLTL 27,000 (+4,000/+7,000)

9. GL 22,000 (-1,000)/+11,000)

September 20-24, 2004

Viewers in Millions

1. Y&R 5,250,000 (-82,000/-720,000)

2. B&B 3,739,000 (-39,000/-768,000)

3. GH 3,468,000 (-431,000/-597,000)

4. AMC 3,382,000 (-516,000/-176,000)

5. DAYS 3,356,000 (-105,000/-513,000)

6. ATWT 3,205,000 (+67,000/-749,000)

7. OLTL 2,941,000 (-435,000/-622,000)

8. GL 2,736,000 (+54,000/-678,000)

9. PSNS 2,349,000 (-41,000/-284,000)

1. Y&R 4.2/16 (+.1)

2. B&B 3.1/11 (+.1)

3. GH 2.9/10 (-.2)

4. AMC 2.8/10 (-.3)

4. DAYS 2.8/10 (-.1)

6. ATWT 2.7/10 (+.1)

7. OLTL 2.5/9 (-.2)

8. GL 2.3/8 (+.1)

9. PSNS 1.9/7 (same)

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. Y&R 1,497,000 (+54,000/-109,000)

2. DAYS 1,357,000 (-91,000/-155,000)

3. GH 1,325,000 (-161,000/-335,000)

4. AMC 1,152,000 (-264,000/-103,000)

5. PSNS 1,085,000 (+9,000/-89,000)

6. B&B 1,053,000 (+12,000/-264,000)

7. OLTL 1,024,000 (-303,000/-373,000)

8. ATWT 881,000 (+44,000/-237,000)

9. GL 824,000 (+22,000/-183,000)

Women 18-49

1. Y&R 2.3/16 (+.1)

2. DAYS 2.1/13 (-.1)

3. GH 2.0/13 (-.3)

4. AMC 1.8/11 (-.4)

5. PSNS 1.7/11 (+.1)

6. B&B 1.6 (same)

6. OLTL 1.6 (-.4) <– ties low

8. ATWT 1.3 (same)

8. GL 1.3 (+.1)

Girls 12-17 Viewers

1. PSNS 68,000 (+3,000/-2,000)

2. DAYS 50,000 (+9,000/-11,000)

3. GH 28,000 (-19,000/-36,000)

4. Y&R 27,000 (-46,000/-13,000)

5. OLTL 21,000 (-6,000/-12,000)

6. ATWT 18,000 (-18,000/-25,000)

7. AMC 14,000 (-16,000/-17,000)

8. B&B 12,000 (-47,000/-44,000)

9. GL 7,000 (-15,000/-28,000)

Sept 27 - Oct 1, 2004

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,159,000 (-91,000/-844,000)

2. B&B 3,627,000 (-112,000/-813,000)

3. DAYS 3,548,000 (+192,000/-382,000)

4. GH 3,542,000 (+74,000/-423,000)

5. AMC 3,480,000 (+98,000/-280,000)

6. ATWT 3,227,000 (+22,000/-728,000)

7. OLTL 2,935,000 (-6,000/-750,000)

8. GL 2,649,000 (-87,000/-749,000)

9. PSNS 2,325,000 (-24,000/-209,000)

1. Y&R 4.1 (-.1)

2. B&B 3.0 (-.1)

2. GH 3.0 (+.1)

4. DAYS 2.9 (+.1)

5. AMC 2.8 (same)

6. ATWT 2.5 (-.2)

6. OLTL 2.5 (same)

8. GL 2.1 (-.2) <----------ties series low

9. PSNS 1.9 (same)

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. DAYS 1,551,000 (+194,000/-71,000)

2. Y&R 1,481,000 (-16,000/-213,000)

3. GH 1,303,000 (-22,000/-355,000)

4. AMC 1,291,000 (+139,000/-23,000)

5. OLTL 1,123,000 (+99,000/-290,000)

6. B&B 1,065,000 (+12,000/-250,000)

7. PSNS 1,054,000 (-31,000/-100,000)

8. ATWT 906,000 (+25,000/-216,000)

9. GL 768,000 (-56,000/-362,000)

Women 18-49

1. DAYS 2.4/15 (+.3)

1. Y&R 2.3 (same)

3. AMC 2.0 (+.2)

3. GH 2.0 (same)

5. OLTL 1.7 (+.1)

6. PSNS 1.6/11 (-.1)

6. B&B 1.6 (same)

8. ATWT 1.4 (+.1)

9. GL 1.2 (-.1) <---- low

Girls 12-17

1. PSNS 68,000 (same/-7,000)

2. DAYS 54,000 (+4,000/-13,000)

3. Y&R 49,000 (+22,000/+2,000)

4. GH 42,000 (+14,000/-5,000)

5. GL 31,000 (+24,000/-1,000)

6. B&B 29,000 (+17,000/-1,000)

7. ATWT 25,000 (+7,000/-27,000)

8. OLTL 21,000 (same/-21,000)

9. AMC 14,000 (same/-21,000)

Views 6.3k
Created 19 yr19 yr
Last Reply 19 yr19 yr

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

No registered users viewing this page.

DAYS: December 2025 Discussion Thread

It is very strange. They have insisted on having 30+ contract players for years now. If they had less cast, they could up everyone's episode guarantees, balance the cast out more. Like 20-25 would be perfect. Have everyone else recur.
If you look back at the history of the show, especially in the 1970s and in the 2010s, whenever the show was at it's most successful, it had smaller casts. Audience relate to the characters more, because they see more of them. In 2009 and 2013, the show had arguable it's most successful periods since the early 2000s (ratings wise that is). They had smaller casts and focused on 3 or 4 stories the whole year. That's what they should be doing at this point. Have a few umbrella stories, that last the whole year, and involve the whole cast. But again, before that, fix who we see on screen cause.....😬

By cody_1990 · 9 minutes ago9 min
DAYS: Jason47's Horton Ornament Countdown

By JAS0N47 · 21 minutes ago21 min
Classic Commercials

I just wanted to add a thread where you can post classic commercials. Ones you like, find interesting, or feature soap actors.
This a quirky one from the early 70's. The actors look familiar. I like how the husband barely pays attention to her rambling about Oversauces.
A childhood holiday classic from 1986 featuring soap actor Greg Wrangler as Peter.

By SoapDope78 · 38 minutes ago38 min
BTG: December 2025 Discussion Thread

She works in the hospital scenes when interacting with Shanice and the other characters.. and could be used effectively in medical stories... but the Mary Sue persona is what needs to go.
With Dani/Andre taking off, I think the writers are trying to figure out what to do with Ashley.. and perhaps maybe keeping her in a supporting role or focus more on her family background would help.

Great minds.

By Taoboi · 42 minutes ago42 min
BTG: December 2025 Discussion Thread

I suuuuuure do!!! :)

I admit that I've wondered that as well. And I truly believe this story of Tomas trying to make Kat his wife for status is going to wind up being his exit storyline because Kat (and Eva) both have history and chemistry now in the actor playing Izaiah.

I feel that as well. Ashley was an early fave of mine when the show started. And I liked the actress. But the writing did her NO favors.

But that's the thing. Thanks to Chris mentioning Karla's comments, we know that the show has finally made it beyond the filming point where the show has hit the online/audience feedback. And they have and/or are making adjustments like the soaps used to do BITD.

I was happy to hear that the other day because I've been saying for months that MVJ seems so focused on Bill/Dani and Andre/Ashley as endgame when the real fire was Dani/Andre so no need for his feelings for Ashley and Bill with his chemistry and drama with Dani makes a classic soap triangle. Moreso (Bill/Dani as endgame) since the show went out of its way to give Dani and Bill separate storylines so we get to see their character development instead of Hayley who got no development until recently. Meanwhile, Ashley works best in supporting vs the lead the writers were making her out as. And they can do so much better with her in that department by growing Ashley up through her 'dream' job as she called it.

By Taoboi · 43 minutes ago43 min
GH: December 2025 Discussion Thread

EXCUSE ME???

I'm not even caught up yet and what is this I hear about eye lices?

Cuz WHEN I get there, early apologies for the rant I will be going off on.

By Taoboi · 53 minutes ago53 min
Rituals

Yes!!! Thank you very much!!!!! Keep in touch!!

By MissPalmer · 55 minutes ago55 min
BTG: December 2025 Discussion Thread

Wasn't it said they had a 6 month plan and weren't going to deviate from it? IMO it's been a bit detrimental to the show. They need to deviate and listen to feedback

By dragonflies · 1 hour ago1 hr
Knots Landing

From what I understood, I think Empire Valley was supposed to be a Lotus Point only in a much larger scale.
Lotus Point was supposed to the 80s version of a Green resort and office complex that was energy efficient and safe... while Empire Valley was going to be a housing complex that was built to be green, energy efficient, and on a community level. I remember Karen in season 6 being excited about the development and she was one of those annoying environmental feminist nuts

By Soaplovers · 1 hour ago1 hr
DAYS: Behind the Scenes, Articles/Photos

What? I thought that was a dream 😂😂😂

By AbcNbc247 · 1 hour ago1 hr

Sign In

September

Featured Replies

Archived

Recently Browsing 0

Recent Posts

DAYS: December 2025 Discussion Thread

DAYS: Jason47's Horton Ornament Countdown

Classic Commercials

BTG: December 2025 Discussion Thread

BTG: December 2025 Discussion Thread

GH: December 2025 Discussion Thread

Rituals

BTG: December 2025 Discussion Thread

Knots Landing

DAYS: Behind the Scenes, Articles/Photos

Important Information

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)

Chrome (Desktop)

Safari (iOS 16.4+)

Safari (macOS)

Edge (Android)

Edge (Desktop)

Firefox (Android)

Firefox (Desktop)