Jump to content

...A Night Of Nakedness


Roddy

Recommended Posts

  • Members

At Columbia, an Invitation to a Night of Nakedness

An invitation to an all-night party at an undisclosed location is spreading among Columbia University's student body with viral intensity.

"Compadres," the e-mail states, "join us in refusing to comply with a culture that tells us to hide our body, to be ashamed of its scents, secretions, curves, and hair, to conceal those parts that have been dealt sexual connotations. We're gonna f-- this bondage we call clothing and party like the savages we really are."

Following in the footsteps of their exhibitionist peers at Brown and Yale, Columbia undergraduates are staging parties with one basic ground rule - all guests must part with their clothes upon arrival. The invitation circulating around Morningside Heights bans three additional items: cameras, masks, and "spikey things."

"Join us for a night of champagne, martinis, witchcraft, psychedelia, syncopated rhythms, thin bass lines, and body paint," reads the invitation, which was obtained by The New York Sun.

While it's too early to say whether a tradition has been born, the naked party appears to be taking root at Columbia, a school better known for its stringent sexual misconduct policies and grinding course work than for its freeloving co-eds.

"Columbia students are generally not into the exhibitionist realm," said Zachary Bendiner, a senior who edits a campus periodical, the Blue and White. "Rightfully so, because by and large they aren't terribly attractive."

The idea of a naked party may conjure up some of the more outrageously lurid campus scenes found in Tom Wolfe's recent novel "I Am Charlotte Simmons" and feed into parental paranoia about the coarsening of college life. Students who have mustered up the courage to go to one, however, are more likely to downplay the sexual nature of the event. It's more of a social opportunity, they say, to lose one's inhibitions, to engage in interesting, more personal, conversation, and to feel comfortable in one's own skin.

When she was a Yale student, Barbara Bush is said to have been a frequent guest at naked parties, leading Hustler's publisher, Larry Flynt, to offer $1 million for a photograph of the president's daughter at one of them.

The idyllic conception of the party has in the past confronted a harsher reality. At Yale last year, a student who graduated from the university pleaded no contest to a charge of fourth-degree sexual assault of a woman, who accused him of drugging her and assaulting her in a dorm room following a naked party that they both attended in 2002.

"Unfortunately, young people in university environments make mistakes in judgment that can have long-lasting effects," the defendant's lawyer, William Dow, said, according to the Hartford Courant. "The decision to attend a naked party is the epitome of bad judgment by all concerned."

Columbia students say the upcoming party follows one that was held in a law student's apartment in the spring. Both parties were organized by a third-year student from Atlanta, Carla Bloomberg. She is majoring in comparative literature and society, often quotes George Bernard Shaw, and was the subject of a profile in the Blue and White, which described her as a "provocateur."

"If I want to walk around naked, I should be able to do it," she was quoted as saying. She told the publication that the idea of the party originated from an attempt to rebel against the notion that people construct their image through clothing. She also disagrees with society's views on gender differences.

In an e-mail to the Sun, Ms. Bloomberg said, "Why is it ok for a man to walk around shirtless but not for a woman? Why is body hair only acceptable on males?"

A student who attended the party in the spring, Richard Lipkin, said about 80 to 100 naked people - including a fair number of law and business school students - were concentrated in one apartment. Clothes were dumped near the entrance. Women slightly outnumbered men, and people were generally - if not exclusively - good looking, the type who are often more willing to flout culture's restrictions on nudity.

Mr. Lipkin said he had no recollection of the music that was played.

"It was surprisingly comfortable," he said. "Most of the people were quite comfortable. Everyone was pretty mature about it. I don't think anything inappropriate went on. ... People were definitely networking, but there wasn't anything bad going on."

He didn't feel awkward afterward either, he said. He performs Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu as an extracurricular activity and was perfectly comfortable wrestling classmates who had attended the party, he said. The next party, which is slated for December 2, will have the theme of "mythology," the invitation says, and guests are encouraged to wear beads and fairy wings, "as long as you're still nekked."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The actor who plays Martin has been teasing that nobody has guessed Martin's secret. I love that for things like that and the June story we have no idea. I feel like if we didn't have the day ahead feeds Anita's reveal would've been shocking as well. I love that they aren't going the obvious route with these stories. 
    • I tried following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January. There's no video, no impact to my mind as to what's happening. Trying other outlets, to get the truth, but it's hard.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy