Jump to content

Faulkner

Members
  • Posts

    20,924
  • Joined

Posts posted by Faulkner

  1. 5 minutes ago, AbcNbc247 said:

    Since I've been binging on classic B&B and Santa Barbara, I gotta give a shoutout to this gorgeous tall glass of water Todd McKee

     

    Todd McKee | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs | Tumgir

    He’s got a whole bearskin rug on his chest there. Wow. I appreciate when soaps allow their men to be fully hirsute.


    I was trying to find a shirtless shot of William Bumiller, who played Sean on GL (who found Reva on that deserted island after Annie sent Reva to her “death” on that airplane). His hairy shirtlessness was the only watchable thing about that era of GL.
     

  2. 2 minutes ago, KMan101 said:

    It makes more sense for Sally to go after Nick (or even Billy) than Jack but I guess she sees him as a sugar daddy who's easier to target? LOL none of it makes sense. Griffith sucks.

     

    I'd rather not see her be wasted on any of them to be honest.

    In true 2021 Y&R form, they’ve done zero to set this up properly. Just scenes of light flirtation and minor mentoring from Jack. I could totally see someone as ambitious as Sally going for the Big Daddy instead of a second stringer like Billy/Nick, but they haven’t played the beats to get there at all.

  3. 4 minutes ago, Chris B said:

    This is more what I’m expecting in terms of “darkness” and a cross between that show and Brothers and Sisters in terms of tone. In general I’m keeping an open mind. This is unheard of so it’s hard not to have some faith in them if they’re obviously investing some money and energy into it. 

    Big Sky, the David E. Kelley drama that dealt with human sex trafficking in its first story arc, has been a big success (mostly on streaming) for ABC this season, so I’m curious if that’s the tone they’ll aim for. It has a mild Twin Peaks feel to it. I can’t imagine Pine Valley being *that* bleak, but who knows?

  4. 19 minutes ago, mikelyons said:

    Considering how hard it is for networks to successfully replace a soap, they'll leave them where they are. It was once said that once a soap falls below a 1.0 rating, it's out the door. Well, they continue to outperform most of their daytime compatriots, so as long as they make more money in ad revenue than their licensing fee, the four remaining soaps will stay on the air. It's too risky to replace Y&R or DAYS with a "celebrity" talk show or lame game show. They have a reliable audience in an age of deep fractures. Do whatever you can to keep it.

    This. Technology is moving so quickly that it’s hard to know what the media ecosystem will look like in 5-10 years, and certainly a lot of soaps’ core audience is literally dying off, but they’ll be on the air as long as the networks are around IMO. 

  5. I’ve been banging the drum for Phyllis vs. Sally from the jump. As others have said, they feel more evenly matched than Summer vs. Sally. (Many of us wanted Courtney Hope as a Summer recast if Hunter King wasn’t open to returning.) Courtney sorta wakes MS up out of the shticky stupor too.

     

    And anything that moves Stafford closer to the man she *actually* has chemistry with, Peter Bergman, is a good move.

     

    It’s sad that the stories are so shallow these days, as I’d love to see how Ashley and Traci mix it up with Sally. Sally’s just a generically ambitious schemer right now. We’ve not had a scene with Sally as evocative as young Jill admiring Katherine’s things in the Chancellor mansion. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy