Jump to content

The Milli Vanilli fiasco


David V

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Of course, I'm absolutely no fan of lightweight bubblegum dance-pop. However, even so, those of us who are keen on the history of the music industry, those of us of a certain age, will be well aware of Milli Vanilli. And to everyone, Milli Vanilli is synonymous with fakery- and people still remember seeing records being steamrollered! However, those of us in the know about the music industry will be well aware of the facts behind the entire scandal.

Firstly, this shady practice of having people front a group while uncredited singers actually perform in the studios, not to mention the lip-syncing, was certainly nothing new in the industry- even from more respectable artists.

Secondly, Milli Vanilli weren't the only ones guilty of this- it was pretty well-known that Martha Wash was the real singing force behind Black Box (Katrin Quinol appearing on the cover and lip-syncing in clips), and sang on a couple of C+C Music Factory songs. The latter one, however, is not clear cut- Wash sang on "Gonna Make You Sweat" whilst Zelma Davis lip-synced in the clips. However, Davis did sing on the rest of that album and was regarded as being competent at that- and the two did share vocals in "Do You Wanna Get Funky".

There was also Frank Farian's previous high-profile project Boney M, controversy rang loud for a long time as to who sang what. It's generally acknowledged that members of the group sang in the studios but were left off the final mixes (a not uncommon practice with "producer music" in Europe)- however, the members of the group did actually sing live in concert.

The idea was, of course, that Rob Pilatus and Fab Morvan would lip-sync and be the "front men" of Milli Vanilli while the real singers were anonymous studio singers. But what made Milli Vanilli different from all the above?

The fact that they were enormously successful worldwide with a high degree of visibility. They were well aware of what was going on, and the pressure of going along with it got to them- especially to Pilatus, who endured a particularly troubled upbringing. Well, the real factor behind the downfall of Milli Vanilli was their vastly inflated egos, the arrogance they displayed in the public eye. Pilatus compared himself and Milli Vanilli favourably to Elvis Presley, Paul McCartney, Bob Dylan, Paul Simon, et al and was roundly ridiculed for these statements. In the year leading up to the exposure, there was intense speculation regarding the source of talent for the group which only intensified after the Grammy win- and the two guys were not happy with all of it, and actually pressured Farian to let them actually sing.

What made it different from the other groups mentioned was the fact that Milli Vanilli was a complex, well-oiled machine with Morvan and Pilatus as the very public face, and Farian pulling all the strings behind this machine. It was a very elaborate deception which worked a treat on the public at the time.

If anything, the shock wasn't only that they didn't actually sing on those records. When they sang at the press conference after the scandal broke out, in front of a baying for blood media, a voice coach made the point they were perfectly able to do the job they didn't do. That's only partially true- Pilatus couldn't sing to save himself, Morvan has proven in the years since that he can. When they brought out their own record on which they did sing, nobody wanted to know.

It wasn't until later in the 90s when VH1's "Behind the Music" did a special on Milli Vanilli, that they were able to tell the full story themselves, arguing they were deceived into the whole thing and were never comfortable with it. After years of rightfully-earned scorn and ridicule, there was actually a certain amount of sympathy for them following this. Pilatus died of an overdose in 1998, being unable to overcome the demons which he had fought against throughout his life.

The years since have been much kinder to Fabrice Morvan, who has even carved out a career as a solo artist in recent years.

It begs the question whether such practices have ended, or at least subsided, in the music industry in the years since. A lot of us would doubt it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I find that even performers known for authentic performances sometimes enhance their shows with lip-syncing, as a way of maintaining the stylized sound of a recording or keeping vocals clear during dance routines. I wouldn't know who fakes it all the way through, though. Funny, I liked the voice of the Milli Vanilli singer, and I thought he should have gotten a shot at recording under his real identity, image be damned. He helped to create fun songs that would never popular based on looks alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJpvz5bpuwg/ 1996 Daytime Emmy Awards Presentation Show abridged, non-soap content has been edited out On 5-22-1996, in NY, NY, at Radio City Music Hall, featuring the Rockettes, in primetime on CBS, our hosts, Eric Braeden & Melody Thomas Scott  EB introduced NYPD Blue James McDaniel & DAYS Deidre Hall who presented Best Actor with nominees GH Maurice Benard, Y&R Peter Bergman, Y&R Eric Braeden, AMC David Canary & AW Charles Keating who won for the first time.  "Thank you very much ladies & gentlemen. Thank you my dear hearts. I have to confess. I've prepared nothing. I've never been a prize winner. Not even as a child. I lost 3 Emmys. Once I lost a Tony. A friend recently lost an Oscar. My agent said, 'Following in the steps of Susan Lucci couldn't do you any harm.' So I have to rethink my entire career. Ladies & gentlemen, no one person ever deserves such an award. We all know this is the result of collaboration. So I am privileged to accept this on behalf of my fellows at ANOTHER WORLD!"
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Given that we've each commented that Rachel's nonverbal “tells” were definitely meant to be foreboding today.  I'd say there's still an evil streak in Rachel. Also, her Johnny reference seemed oddly knowing... So, I enjoy that this one is a bit smarter, and less weirdo Wednesday Adams with a stuffed snake.
    • I do get that.  I also did think Rachel was the child Kristen and Brady deserved though lol.
    •   I kinda like that Rachel's not really a demon anymore. Kristen's daughter or not, it wasn't necessary for her to be like that.  And just like with GH, we all know that Ron thinks it's funny to write the kids as nasty, obnoxious little sh*ts 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I don't get it either.  It's just a story running in a different city about adoption with anonymous sources.  Why does anyone care?  It's not like she's outing Brook Lynn by name or even touching on her story from what I understood.
    • I loved the Andre/Nicole scene. The actors really sold all the emotions that came with it.    Sean has such chemistry with Karla and Daphne 
    • I was a huge fan of RH the first few years, and I while I can't disagree about unlikeable characters, I still found them interesting. Mainly, I'm thinking of the Frank/Jill/Seneca triangle (with Rae added later). MY GOD, what a group of selfish, controlling, narcissistic a-holes. But I have to say, watching them torch their own lives over and over was pretty fascinating. 
    • Old Rachel just seemed devious always with her elaborate hairstyles and snotty behavior.  I assume this girl is just a better actress or something.  They both seem to have the same capabilities, but I guess we will see where the story goes.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy