Jump to content

What Are You Listening To?


WTGH

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

It seems like the only reason you didn't like it was because they cut out most of the subplots. To me, that is expected. Just look at the length it was: 2.5 hours, and it still felt rushed. I'm not sure many non-book fans would want to sit through it if it was that long. And I thought Gambon did a great job. He made Dumbledore lively, something that was lacking with Harris (But that could have been because he was frail in real life). Sorry I said that, but I just get a little upset when hardcore fans immediately dismiss the movies because they changed minor things that are not needed. J.K. looks at the script, btw, and she gives the "ok" on it. Anyway, a 1 out of 5 is a score Gigli or Hustle and Flow would get, not this. You can't honestly say it was that bad, and if so, give more reason that "Dumbledore was not like that in the book."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy