Jump to content

Greatest Soap Cop-Out's.


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

There was a woman on the show named JoAnn Curtis. Her husband Jack (Anthony Herrera) cheated on her with Peggy Brooks. She was obese. She went to live with Katherine and lost a lot of weight. They became very close. I think they may have kissed, and planned a vacation together. Brock was concerned about their relationship because he felt it was another of his mother's unhealthy fixations. I'm not sure how far the story would have gone, but there was a noticeable ratings drop and Bill Bell bowed to the audience's wishes. Brock convinced his mother that she was making a mistake, and JoAnn was packed off somewhere. 

 

The Adam story I wouldn't even call a copout as much as lurid homophobia and biphobia from a shameful hack of a writer. They never had any interest in exploring anything with Adam. They just wanted us to leer and jeer and know that being a true villain meant being willing to sleep with anyone to get what you want. Or, in the case of conservative Y&R, sleeping with - running your thumb over the mouth of a dumbass twink. 

 

I hated so much about that story but what I hated most was Nellie Oleson and friends gushing over Muhney because he was so willing to play such daring scenes. What a bunch of old sh!t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

I don't know all that went on behind the scenes with Engen, but I was disgusted by the decision to paint rainbow sparkles all over a Celluloid Closet style horror show just so that the soap "press" could get on their knees for Muhney. Oh how brave...how gutsy...that he MIGHT be willing to do something when I imagine he already knew nothing had been filmed beyond tamer, lamer material than something you'd get in a silent movie. Even if he'd been like Russell Tovey and started jiggling his ass around (I can't even remember if he had an ass), the story was still bigoted trash.

 

MAB led Nellie and Jamey and friends up the garden path with this and the Philip story, and it was embarrassing. It also meant that they were never called out the way they should have been. Say what you will about Bill Bell, he never would have done that to viewers, or to lgbt people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I just remember people saying that CE didn't wanna play the scene b/c of his religion or some mess. I think CE later came out and said that had nothing to do with it. I think he stated something along the lines that it made no sense for Adam to do that along with gaslighting Ashley, who was his biggest advocate at the time. 

 

Adam's whole introduction story was garbage. Making him a sociopath was the worst thing ever. Adam should've been a corporate tycoon at the most. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


One thing that I was really able appreciate from the first time I was able to rewatch the early years of RH on Soapnet was that the "villains" weren't evil, monstrous people. They weren't committing murder, taking hostages, torturing, etc. (Well, except for Kenneth Castle because he obsessed over Faith...and even then, he thought he could protect her and get her to love him.) They were basically just people whose motives and desires put them in conflict with other characters. Even though you could pick out who were supposed to be the heroes and who were supposed to be the spoilers or threats, all of them were essentially everyday people trying to figure out how to get what they wanted. Nobody had all-knowing abilities or was necessarily wanting to inflict harm to people. Characters like Roger and Delia resorted to lies and blackmail for personal gain and not to be sadistic. Jack, ostensibly more hero than villain, had so much emotional baggage he acted like a class-A jerk. Seneca was basically a good man who wasn't above trying to exert control. Joe (#1) was so charming and fell so hard for Siobhan, all the while lying to everyone about his and uncle's business. Alongside them you have the supposed "good guys" who come with their own flaws, like extramarital relationships (Frank & Jill), a "salt of the Earth" Irish Catholic family whose staunch beliefs led to some harsh attitudes with their own children. Nobody was perfect, or perfectly evil. They were human.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A few others: 

 

- Josh on ATWT. As already mentioned in the ATWT thread. I didn't have a problem with him becoming a better person or finding love with Meg, but Iva never should have accepted their relationship or gone to their wedding. It should have been a real issue. 

 

- gay men and AIDS. One might say it would have been a stereotype, but soaps not wanting to risk offending Lurlene in Tuscaloosa, or wherever, by having anyone but a pure ingenue suffering from AIDS meant that a lot of rich material and educational material was lost. There were gay men in support groups or as dressers for Lucy Coe or mentioned offcamera as love interests for gay characters, but the first time I can remember seeing an actual gay man actually dying of AIDS was on AMC in early 1995 - 12 years after this epidemic started and 11 or 12 years after the first mentions were made on daytime via Loving. 

 

- acting your age. Soaps stopped letting older characters mature sometime in the early '90s, and it decimated the genre. I'm not sure if any soap showcases this better than Y&R and B&B, where refusal to let characters mature, or in some cases, actually regressing them to where they never were even in their youngest years oncanvas, laid waste to characters like Brooke, Taylor, Victor, Sharon, Victoria, and Nick, among others. I'm not sure if anything could be more embarrassing than middle-aged Brooke and Taylor squawking like schoolgirls.

 

- rape and baby death/infertility stories in place of actually writing challenging material for women. AMC in particular dug its own grave with this. 

 

- DAYS Jack and rape. As tacky and sexist as it was to have Jennifer raped so that Jack could experience a woman he loved being raped, one scene stood out - when she rejected his advances and, when he didn't get the message (as he didn't know she'd been raped), she shouted "Stay away from me, you rapist!" and slapped him. Jack realized he could never escape his past. It was great work from both Melissa Reeves and Matthew Ashford. This duality in Jack should never have left the character, but instead the show just made him either a generic piece of ass (when Ashford wasn't there) or a clown (when Ashford was there). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

RH: Delia regressions.

 

The show did this over and over and over again, because it was easier and could drive plot for the "good" main characters. They had spent several years maturing Delia and then took all that away in order to have her scheme against Faith and be an obstacle for the tedious Faith/Frank pairing. The sight of sanctimonious, self-righteous Barry, Faith and Roger lording it over Delia just made me hate all three characters (especially since Barry and Roger were a big reason why she became what she was), which I can't imagine was the intent of the writing. And making this even worse is that saintly "good" Faith went on to be nastier and cruder to Jill than Delia ever was when she finally realized Frank was never actually in love with her. Yet no one said a word to Faith, because the writing could never see Faith as anything but a victim, even though KMG was unable to play that aspect of the character. 

 

And then when Ilene Kristen returned in 1982 the show soon did this again, this time with Frank and Jill. Is it any wonder viewers weren't interested by this point? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think dropping the gay characters on OLTL was a huge cop-out.

 

on GH- it was pretty clear the show was implying Brenda and Dante had been a couple.  I know Vanessa was fighting against it, but they copped out of telling the story that was airing.

 

The text message killer being Diego was terrible too.  

 

And whatever was the original story of Laura and the attic and Rick before Genie quit.  It seemed like Rick was going to take over the hospital and have a much longer arc, and possibly also have molested Laura.  But we got crazy Laura and dead Rick instead.

 

Also- why bring Lesley back to life to do nothing with her?  I mean she's never had a story since.  Great to see her, but nothing of depth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I think that -- and not necessarily the fact that Justin Hartley has moved on -- is the reason why Sally Sussman responded the way she did when Michael Logan asked her about possibly bringing back Adam.  I think SS is just as disgusted as we are about how Adam had turned out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy