Jump to content

Daytime's Master Headwriters: Their Strongest and Weakest Work


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Mine are probably the obvious, but just to contribute...

Bradley Bell:

Strongest: B&B 1993-1995

Honorable Mention: B&B 1998-2002ish

Weakest:2003-present (though there have been some bright spots in the past few years)

 

James E. Reilly 

DOOL:

Strongest:1993-1998

Weakest:2003-2006

 

PASSIONS:

Strongest:1999-2003

Weakest:2004-2008

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The internet is a wonderful thing, and allows us all access to all sorts of historical information. Jason's DAYS History site is an amazing resource.

The failure of LOVING was quite baffling to me. I thought that between Agnes Nixon and Douglas Marland, success would have been guaranteed. In a later interview, Marland acknowledged that their work together was not successful, but he did not elaborate as to why. I guess even the greatest writers can can their off days. SANTA BARBARA under the Dobsons had a certain tone and style that I felt would not necessarily appeal to everyone, but I think what really killed it was the hiring of Anne Howard Bailey, who was a dreadful writer. After her dismal failures on primetime's BEACON HILL and daytime's HOW TO SURVIVE A MARRIAGE, it shocked me that Bailey would ever get a job in soaps again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've always wondered how much Marland actually contributed to the creation of Loving. Dan Wakefield was originally slated to be the co-creator along with Nixon. But then he left and was replaced by Marland. And supposedly the show's premiere was delayed from March to June. I wonder how the show changed after Marland came on board.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

And then to work AGAIN at DAYS after such an awful track record (particularly when Patrick Mulcahey has basically admitted the staff would rewrite ALL of her work before it went to air because it was so god-awful), a move which the show didn't recover from until Reilly's stories took off five years later (and, though I love that era, I question whether or not that's a good thing). It's utterly baffling. The woman must have been the ultimate sweet talker, because her work never backed up the amount of employment she'd get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I really think the last head writer to have any modicum of control over the direction of GH in that period would have been Pat Falken Smith. After that, it seems to me to have been a very active collaboration with Monty, though I imagine she had her hands in Marland and PFS' work to some degree as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Monty was producing an entertaining show with the actors generating tons of chemistry and acting the crap out of lackluster stories for most of her first tenure.  The exceptions for me are those first few years under Marland and PFS the show had stories and again once Pat returned, the show once again had stories.  I feel those two periods are the best of the Monty era, even if I loved it overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy