Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

India has always been an odd, exceptional case though.  Years ago, both China and India complained that they shouldn't be lectured to by Western countries that enriched their own economies using fossil fuels. China though has changed perspectives, especially after gaining such an advantage in the solar industry. 

India, however still struggles with their use of coal and fossil fuels and this is for a few reasons.

India, like China,  with a billion population,  has not been able to advance its economy or raise people out of poverty as fast as China has been able to, so India is still reluctant to be as committed as China has become in its ability to pull back on the use of fossil fuels.

Environmentalists in India, with help from citizens who are sick of dirty air (Delhi has some of the worst air pollution on earth, often surpassing Beijing's poor air quality in levels of particulate matter) pushed the government to make more of a commitment and India's government slowed the rate of building of coal-fired power plants but not nearly as much as China, which has actually closed plants.

 

In India, it's not so much about protecting the industry as it is about wanting to use the fastest means available to raise people out of poverty.  Change takes time, effort and money. 

And for all the talent that India has (it has probably the highest number of highly skilled tech workers), India has a very messy bureaucracy and infrastructure and for these reasons India's economy has lagged compared to China.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    5830

  • DRW50

    5599

  • DramatistDreamer

    5284

  • Khan

    3201

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Ah.

 

Well.  That just shows to go you how ignorant that organization is about a great many things.  Even if a (fake) news network COULD openly declare war on the FBI and the Justice Department, don't they realize that at least one of those entities might have files on their top execs that could be leaked to the media "accidentally"?  Do they REALLY want to poke that bear?

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy