Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    5821

  • DRW50

    5591

  • DramatistDreamer

    5278

  • Khan

    3198

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members


They have the cures for all the diseases you named......but what is making them more money? people being cured or people being sick? how many pills does a HIV-Positive or AIDS patient take a day? many forms of cancer have been cured but not all forms. BP loses oney then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yes.  Big Pharma isn't interested in curing anything.  They're interested in making money and the way to do that is to manage illnesses, not cure them.  

 

The NIH, CDC and to some extent, Walter Reed will the be driving forces behind curing folks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What proof do you have of this? You really think "they" have the cure for cancer and have managed to hide it?  We all have the right to believe what we want I guess, but that sounds like conspiracy theory to me.  Especially since American big pharma is not the only one doing research into these diseases.

How about all the vaccines disease and the diseases that have already been cured?  There is more money in managing every illness we have a vaccine for.  Just like vaccines big pharma would make a mint of the cure for cancer. Not that cancer is one disease anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good news for the people of Wisconsin - a Democrat flipped a state senate seat that went 55% for Trump in the last election, one that the talking heads said they wouldn't be able to win. 

 

http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/democrat-wins-special-election-in-northwestern-wisconsin/article_ddbdd542-800e-506b-8882-78c9551fc034.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is scary. That in the wrong hands, a set nuclear policy can be re-written to be much more aggressive with a lower set of criteria for an attack.

 

“Almost everything about this radical new policy will blur the line between nuclear and conventional,...will make nuclear war a lot more likely.”

 

Pentagon Suggests Countering Devastating Cyberattacks With Nuclear Arms

 

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy