Jump to content

GH Writer Addresses Michael Shooting


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The fact of the matter is that Guza is already claiming that having Michael shot was done to appease the audience. He is never going to deal with what irks many viewers because he would prefer to invoke the viewers ire as a means of justifying whatever shocking thing he chooses to do. There is no possible way that he came to the illogical conclusion that people saying Michael should pay for what he did to Kate meant they wanted Michael to be shot in the head.

This would have been different in terms of consequences if Michael had accidentally shot himself or a family member with legitimate fallout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will say that I think something happening to Michael is the one that has the capabilities of affecting the most people. It is what probably could create the most amount of emotional drama and turmoil. So that point I actually get.

ON THE OTHER HAND, saying that this is Michael's punish for the gun, saying that it would make fans feel better about the slap on the wrist he got about getting the gun, and that GH has been nothing but glorifying violence is all a bunch of BS!

At the moment I am seeing the drama and emotional turmoil in this story. It is keeping my interest. But I am not holding my breath for Guza to tell the story correctly and actually keeping it an emotional story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dont see anything wrong with shooting Michael. I dont agree with the train of thought that him getting shot is a consequence for him picking up a gun. I think it should be more of a consequence of the life Sonny leads. His life affects those around him and it was only a matter of time before one of his kids got hurt. I think thats where they should be focusing this on and really bring about a real change bc for him to go back to leading the violent mob life as if nothing happened would have made this all a waste. Even with Carly, this should bring about change and stop her from seeing Sonny and his life through rose colored glasses and realize the true nightmare which is her family's life thanks to association with the mob. They make light of it and this story should cause them all to rethink their current positions. Id have killed Michael off and really gone for the full effect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Yeah it has the potential......but we're not going to see the side of the story that a lot of people want to see. Where's Bobbie? Where are the Q's? Will Sonny/Carly say anything to Morgan? Will will see Morgan's reaction, or even Kristina's? Where's his FAMILY? Only Sonny, Jason and Carly are Michael's family?

Instead all we see is the MOB angle and that is the only angle Bob Guza wants to tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^^Completely agree with you there Toups. That is why I said at the moment I could go along with the story because it is dealing with those aspects that are in the potential. I am not looking at this with blinders on because I know at some point the potential and real focus of where the story should go will be lost to only the MOB aspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, they are new pictures of him.
    • I would submit to you that she doesn't need any more excuses, not when it comes to Bill. But, I am one fan who thinks Bill isn't done with Dani & also the reverse is so. Those two, IMO, are locked in some kind of toxic but  irresistible vortex. I'm not saying we're going to have scifi. Just the personality kind of vortex. OH!!! Thanks. I don't do Y&R. But I totally understand anger even frustration with Josh.
    • Any chance you could share this episode to the vault? Please.
    • @asafi @yrfan1983 Jennifer Brooks death was September 1977. A recap of it is here    
    • a reference to a mystery character on Y&R named "Aristotle Dumas" who has been discussed a zillion times in the past few months but never seen.  Not mad at the character.  Mad at Y&R writer Griffith for the annoyance. Mentioned to point out the annoyances of Y&R in contrast to enthusiasm for BTG.
    • It also seemed like she wanted an excuse to go over Bill's and yell at him.
    • The number 1 rated soap, and no one seems to like it. I don’t remember the last episode I watched. The Damian story was the only thing keeping me watching but I just gave up on the show altogether again.
    • Not all friends are alike though and there should be a counterbalance in some friendships on soaps. Dani has already been all over the place enough and doesn't need an unstable friend.
    • I was finally warming up to Eva but today, that girl, what in the world was she thinking, crawling back to Mama saying she was under a lot of pressure. Pitiful. And, just what did she get for her trouble? Rebuffed, totally. Anastasia, she can go kick rocks. Who needs her & what was she wearing? I'm surprised to learn that some people did not have an appreciation of Dani & then Anita, right after, at Theodore's. I thought they were both right on the money & also sharp, witty.  Ted, of course, is playing at being Impervious Man, which is very funny & he takes it one step further, making all these declarations of his intent to woo Nicole back & win her trust again. I find myself laughing so hard at him & at how he has totally misread his circumstances. He has zero chance but wow he has so much confidence. This I find to be so humorous, possibly unintentionally so.  Edit to add: What does Alexander Dumas have to do with anything? And why are people seeming to be mad at him?
    • They feel like a bad Three's Company parody.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy