Jump to content

All My Children

Sign in to follow this  

34 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 5,516 views
  1. 2005

    • 0 replies
    • 4,281 views
  2. 2004

    • 0 replies
    • 2,448 views
  3. 2003

    • 0 replies
    • 3,059 views
  4. 2002

    • 0 replies
    • 2,559 views
  5. 2001

    • 0 replies
    • 2,540 views
  6. 2000

    • 0 replies
    • 2,943 views
  7. 1999

    • 0 replies
    • 2,941 views
  8. 1997

    • 0 replies
    • 3,720 views
  9. 1995

    • 0 replies
    • 3,007 views
  10. 1994

    • 0 replies
    • 3,802 views
  11. 1992

    • 0 replies
    • 3,067 views
  12. 1991

    • 0 replies
    • 2,661 views
  13. 1990

    • 0 replies
    • 3,222 views
  14. 1988

    • 0 replies
    • 2,779 views
  15. 1986

    • 0 replies
    • 2,927 views
  16. 1983

    • 0 replies
    • 2,611 views
  17. 1971

    • 0 replies
    • 2,523 views
  18. 1978

    • 0 replies
    • 2,361 views
  19. 2006

    • 0 replies
    • 2,884 views
  20. 1987

    • 0 replies
    • 3,974 views
  21. 1984

    • 0 replies
    • 2,368 views
  22. 2007

    • 0 replies
    • 2,663 views
  23. 1982

    • 0 replies
    • 4,001 views
  24. 1993

    • 0 replies
    • 4,342 views
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Guns 'N Roses did a cover of "Since I Don't Have You" back in the early '90s. Axl Rose being Axl Rose had to add in a line to the song that I think encompasses the whole Democratic position as of now:   "Yep, we're f-u-c-k-e-d."
    • I liked Rusty. I didn't like Johnny. Didn't hate him either. But i him found boring. I liked James Goodwin on AW better. 
    • Agreed. There was much more balance in the 90's with the Newman's. I would say Nick being aged up was where things changed, but no too much. He did become more of a focal point, but not so much at the expense of the rest of the show. The fact that in the 90's you still had Sheila/Lauren and Nina/David as well as Jill having her stories and bringing in the Winters/Barbers. There was still a lot going on that had nothing or little to do with either The Abbott's or Newman's.   I always got the feeling Bill Bell learned his lesson from making JLB's Lorie too important and too much the star of the show. He seemed to never do that again, even if he did have favourite characters he liked front and centre. I do agree though. The mob stories in 83 and 85 were okay but not spectacular. The whole reason I love Y&R is the pscyhology of the characters, it was fascinating to see what they would do next, how they would react to certain situations etc...   There is a great scene when John had a heart attack after an arguement with Victor. Nikki rips through him for what has happened, but you can tell Nikki is really raging about so many other things under the surface that she hasn't been able to express. Add to that Victor refuses to back down, but you can tell Nikki is making him feel guilty, an emotion he would rarely if ever admit to. This was always the beauty of Y&R, so much going on beneath the surface.
    • I might be wrong to say this, but I think Bill Bell was never all that great with the more "action" like events the show did....It's not a bad thing, but I can't argue other soaps did those type of scenes better. Bill was more of a psychological soap writer, playing out all the emotional beats until the climax,  which is why a lot of later writers ruined the show trying to make it like every other soap. 
    • I have a little more mixed feelings about Johnny (all the singing mainly and I don't know if he was a leading man - he's OK though) but I liked Rusty. There was a real sweetness about Terrell Anthony that I connected with.
×
×
  • Create New...