Jump to content


  • Posts

    • I feel like streaming has done a lot of good here to carry the flag of the above shows and push things forward, with series like Sense8, High Fidelity (with Zoe Kravitz as a sexually fluid lead), Special, Dear White People, Transparent, Orange is the New Black, and dozens of series that most of us may not know but are waiting for discovery. The ability to narrowcast programming, without pressure to please a broadcast-size audience, has been sooo beneficial. Network TV isn’t even close to doing a good enough job, primetime or daytime. (The CW had been making some strides in recent years.) Cable at least has dramas like Pose, but they could be doing more, beyond the Ryan Murphy stuff and Killing Eve, etc.   I’m curious about the sexually fluid idea for soaps. It would definitely open up the number of available partners a character could have (the advice to be “not too specific,” so that any character could be anyone’s brother or sister or lover).   But a lot of us mention that the secret between Kyle and Theo on Y&R should have been that they were lovers, instead of the banal stupidity about drugs and girls that it ultimately became. Would the blue hairs in the audience have accepted Kyle with Summer and Lola with the knowledge that he banged/got banged by a dude? No. 1, the writers don’t have the luxury of setting that story up properly (patience just isn’t a thing that soaps value these days), and No. 2, they’ve struggled so hard for years to find a youngish male lead who clicked with the audience, which Michael Mealor has done, and they don’t want to “taint” him with risky storytelling. Especially when they felt they ticked that box with Mariah, which they’ll pat themselves on the back for but won’t really invest in. (I know they also did it with Adam, but his sex with Rafe was a homophobic attempt to show how much of a sociopath he was, which only made his “rescue” by Sharon’s love more appealing.) I think soaps feel much more comfortable creating fluid female characters, and we have all of two of them on daytime (Kristina on GH and Mariah).   Soaps have always also done LGBT stories with characters under 40. The few major exceptions have been psychos (Nora’s serial killer husband on OLTL and the dude Lucinda was dating who was creeping on Luke on ATWT). I sort of get it, because they’re using LGBT stories to pull in younger viewers, but it feels like a missed opportunity. There’s so much richness in the lives of older characters.
    • Long-time lurker, first-time poster here. I just wanted to point out that GL actually did bring Mike (and Don Stewart) back very briefly in 1997, for the 60th anniversary. You can see him around the middle of this clip, interacting with Rick, Meta, Ross, and Blake: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBLINo71kLA
    • Beverly Hills is ok but could be so much better if the same thing wasn't talked about every episode of the season until you want to scream. Every season has that one thread and then it's done.    I'm trying to watch Housewives of Johannesburg but I can't find whole episodes anywhere. I want to try something different until Potomac comes back. 

News, Previews and Interviews

Daytime and primetime television news from the staff of Soap Opera Network.

Subforums

  1. Validation Information

    For those that have yet to be verified and can't post on the SON Community Message Boards

    2
    posts

464 topics in this forum

    • 2 replies
    • 223 views
    • 0 replies
    • 119 views
    • 0 replies
    • 243 views
    • 0 replies
    • 116 views
    • 0 replies
    • 129 views
    • 0 replies
    • 191 views
    • 0 replies
    • 200 views
    • 0 replies
    • 135 views
    • 0 replies
    • 309 views
    • 0 replies
    • 120 views
    • 0 replies
    • 77 views
    • 0 replies
    • 93 views
    • 1 reply
    • 254 views
    • 0 replies
    • 257 views
    • 0 replies
    • 105 views
    • 0 replies
    • 118 views
    • 1 reply
    • 132 views
    • 0 replies
    • 624 views
    • 0 replies
    • 196 views
    • 0 replies
    • 173 views
    • 0 replies
    • 158 views
    • 1 reply
    • 254 views
    • 0 replies
    • 128 views
    • 0 replies
    • 139 views
    • 3 replies
    • 156 views
×
×
  • Create New...