Jump to content

What storylines do you think soap operas would never do?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Not to be rude, but for some, that would be like literally looking in a mirror, only the "friends dropping by for a visit" are the soap characters they're watching on TV for 1 hour a day (or half-hour, if you're a B&B fan).

Some of these topics are just too depressing. Escapism would go out the window and suicide rates of shut-ins would increase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But they have a point. Even I, who gets all sanctimonious and self-righteous at the mere mention of soaps being escapist fare and nothing else, believe there are some topics that, for whatever reason, just wouldn't work on a traditional soap opera.

Q: I've read how Y&R had their characters break into song back in the day. Anyone know why Bill Bell phased out that stuff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's what I was going to reply with--that with the right team, it can be done and handled properly. It might be a little tough for the audience to swallow, but that's daytime. Daytime was the original genre to push the envelope. Look at Roger/Holly's marital rape. It was a tough pill to swallow but it lead to many women speaking out about being raped, and it's one of GL's most memorable and renowned stories. That story alone set the foundation for multiple stories till GL's end. It was that powerful.

And replying to EllaBelle, I respect your opinion; however, most child actors have the mindset of a grown person. I think they'd be able to handle this type of material. Not a 3 or 4 year old, but I think a young actor from about 8-15 would be able to handle it. We learn about "good touch, bad touch early on." The concept wouldn't be new to them, and I think a w/ production and their parents would make them realize that this fake (the acting itself) BUT it's a serious story that occurs to many their age.

And no one is asking that show the actual molestation on screen. It can be implied and hinted too before the attack occurs. I just think that it's a good story to tell and one that should be told. EastEnders had the balls to do it. Why can't we?

It was bit before my time, but I think he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

done it...well sort of. Todd Manning was "raped" by that evil Margret Cockran on One Life to LIve. Although they weren't involved. She just had a sick obsession with him so she kidnapped him and raped him. Of course we now consiser that man to be Victor Lord Clayton but that's a whole other story. LOL The man being raped is a storyline that is rarely shown.

and about "kinky sex", I know on One Life, they hinted that Alex Hessor and her husband Carlo also had a very kinky sex life. I don't know how graphic that got either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestly think that the higher-ups cater to a certain fan demographic that is preventing them from "GOING THERE" with several storylines and are afraid of losing those viewers

Look at the uproar over the new content of AMC/OLTL 2.0 before they were even streamed

Also, they folks in charge just don't care

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
That pretty much sums it up for me. I remember the pearl clutching that was going in numerous GH threads over siblings Britt and Nathan possibly hooking up before they found out they were related. I remember there was pearl clutching over the Cassandra storyline in the AMC thread. Y&R had a cult storyline scrapped in part because the TPTB was afraid of the fan's reaction to it. I could go on and on.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy