Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 15.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2696

  • DramatistDreamer

    1892

  • Soapsuds

    1627

  • P.J.

    763

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I think they killed him off as that was the start of the Fred Bartholeme (producer) get rid of the "old" people thing. I do agree though, what to do with Kim and Dan next? Luckily back in those days they didnt keep breaking super couples up and putting them together like Carjack, Lily and Holden, Josh and Reva...etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

John Colenback was popular in his first stint  as Dan,but it was John Reilly that established the Kim/Dan relationship and I don't think Colenback worked as well as Reilly with Kathryn Hays.

Still, killing off Dan was a mistake.Maybe he could have been ill and left Oakdale,not wanting to be a burden etc

The other root problem was sorasing Dan in the first place.When Colenback came on in 66,Dan should have been 8,but Irna made him early 20's and Colenback was older than the character. That led to problems down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good question, and it ties in to what Paul stated above.  Paul is right - Colenback's Dan didn't really have the same chemistry with Hayes that Reilly did.  With that said, I would have started a Bob/Kim/Dan triangle immediately after Betsy found out that Dan was her dad instead of her uncle.  Bob could have been her doctor during that deafness Betsy had (I think it was deafness), and Betsy could have bonded with Bob in a fatherly way (since she would have trust issues with Dan). Bob and Kim are drawn to each other again, creating conflict between Bob and Dan.  Heck, I would have brought back Susan and Emily to make things even worse for Dan's situation.  If they needed to get rid of Dan, they could always have Dan leave town healthy, and perhaps bring him back later if necessary.  They always kept Kim and Bob apart during this time, and I hated Dana and Nick.

But, the SORAS-ing of Dan was always an issue back when Irna first did it in 1966.  Its shifted the structure of the canvas quite a bit. Dan was supposed to be more of a peer to Tom Hughes, but instead was now a peer to Bob (instead of David being Bob's peer), Ellen was now a peer to Nancy, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good point, the death of Dan really could have fixed that...as at that time Ellen and David had age appropriate daughters (sort of). At least they let Ellen out of her bun when David came back to town with amnesia but by that time Nancy was gone and Chris was sidelined, and they should have played heavily in that as parent figures to David and Ellen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy