I'm one of those Democrats that voted for Hillary over Obama in 2008 primary, and if that makes me a troll, so be it. The only conservative that posts on here is GregNYC, and he doesn't really defend his positions. I'm a member of other forums, where there's more diverse political viewpoints (Conservatives, Libetarians, Bernie Bros, Liberals), and we go back and forth with each other.
That's just not true. I would make the same argument for every one of them.
Jill being left out of it and Kay giving CI directly to the Phillip's would have also been fair.
I don't think there's a problem with Devon, or any of them, working at Chancellor if they wanted. Why would Jill care? But none of them wanted to. And no one here seems to think Devon should work under Jill, it has to be Neil. Why? Jill's just as capable.
I don't know what the problem is. They are giving Devon & Neil their own onscreen company with their names on it. It's the big story that's starting next week.
If Matthew Ashford was still on the show I would be screaming for it. Of course, KC wouldn't bother doing it for the same reason that he fired Matt so many times to begin with: to him Jack Deveraux was just "that guy Jennifer Horton married." He totally forgot how huge a star MA was, completely independent of Missy Reeves. In fact, Jack was the dominant character in the pairing during their supercouple heyday.
I would love to see Jack and Angelica Deveraux interacting again, along with scenes that included Justin, Adrienne, and Alexander.
If this were about Brock, Mackenzie, Billy, Cane or even a pre-insane Chloe wanting to work at and/or run Chancellor? This wouldn't even be an issue.
3 months? Try three days.
Look how much story & airtime Scott has received & he's only been on the canvas for two months.